Silverman v. Newgold

35 Misc. 2d 180, 232 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3519
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 12, 1962·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The removal of the tenant from the hotel apartment No. 419, which was controlled, to decontrolled apartment No. 722, was for the benefit and convenience of the landlord. The tenant continued to be a statutory tenant and entitled to the protection of the Emergency Housing Rent Control Law (L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.). A statutory tenant may not be evicted by reason of the termination of the prime tenant’s lease. (McDonald v. Hector, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 64 [App. Term, 1st Dept.] ; Harwyn Dress Corp. v. International Dress Co., 147 N. Y. S. 2d 254; 610 West End Co. v. Cohen, 19 Misc 2d 130.)

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur — Hofstadter, J. P., Gold and Capozzoli, JJ.

Pinal order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silverman v. Newgold, 35 Misc. 2d 180, 232 N.Y.S.2d 133, 1962 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

35 Misc. 2d 180 (Silverman v. Newgold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

610 West Bud Co. v. Cohen
19 Misc. 2d 130 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1959)