Silverman v. Lurie
This text of 32 Misc. 734 (Silverman v. Lurie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no weight to the defendant’s contention that there is a nonjoinder of the parties plaintiff. The documentary evidence shows conclusively that the plaintiff is the only party in interest. Nor is there any weight in the defendant’s claim that he was evicted from the premises. As a matter of fact, he was not either actually or constructively evicted from the premises or any portion of them. He occupied them and should pay the rent.
It is well settled in this State that the defense of constructive eviction is not available to the tenant without a surrender of the premises. Boreel v. Lawton, 90 N. Y. 293.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.
Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 734, 66 N.Y.S. 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-lurie-nyappterm-1900.