Silverman v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights

New York Court of Appeals

Silverman v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights

435 N.E.2d 1095, 56 N.Y.2d 608, 450 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3280, 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 316

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 435 N.E.2d 1095 (Silverman v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silverman v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights, 435 N.E.2d 1095, 56 N.Y.2d 608, 450 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3280, 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 316 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the compensatory damage award of the New York City Commission on Human Rights reinstated. The evidence of pain, suffering and mental anguish produced in this case to prove compensatory damages was sufficient to support the commission’s determination on that issue (Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143).

[610]*610Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the compensatory damage award of the New York City Commission on Human Rights reinstated. The evidence of pain, suffering and mental anguish produced in this case to prove compensatory damages was sufficient to support the commission’s determination on that issue (Batavia Lodge No. 196, Loyal Order of Moose v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 35 NY2d 143).

[610]*610Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 N.E.2d 1095, 56 N.Y.2d 608, 450 N.Y.S.2d 480, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3280, 44 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-city-of-new-york-commission-on-human-rights-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack