Silverman v. Charles Jacobs Co.
146 N.Y.S. 1067
This text of 146 N.Y.S. 1067 (Silverman v. Charles Jacobs Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Silverman v. Charles Jacobs Co., 146 N.Y.S. 1067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
It is unnecessary to pass upon the merits of the motion to open defendant’s default, as the order must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, because the testimony on the inquest did not disclose a cause of action against the defendant. Appeal from judgment dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 N.Y.S. 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-charles-jacobs-co-nyappterm-1914.