Silverman v. Chaplin

523 A.2d 294, 514 Pa. 141, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 654
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 3, 1987
DocketPetition No. 387 Eastern District Allocatur Docket 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 523 A.2d 294 (Silverman v. Chaplin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silverman v. Chaplin, 523 A.2d 294, 514 Pa. 141, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 654 (Pa. 1987).

Opinion

[142]*142ORDER OF COURT

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, to-wit, this 3rd day of March, 1987, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED.

In view of this Court’s Opinion in Amadio v. Levin, 509 Pa. 199, 501 A.2d 1085 (1985), the order of Superior Court, 330 Pa.Super. 609, 478 A.2d 130, in this matter is hereby VACATED, and this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is hereby directed to reinstate the third count of Petitioner’s complaint, and to conduct further proceedings not inconsistent with Amadio v. Levin, supra.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and HUTCHINSON, JJ., note their dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amadio v. Levin
501 A.2d 1085 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 A.2d 294, 514 Pa. 141, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-v-chaplin-pa-1987.