Silverman v. Camp

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Silverman v. Camp

320 A.2d 832, 166 Conn. 690

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 11, 1974·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s “Motion For Permission To Appeal Before This Conrt” in the appeals from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that Alfred S. Julien of the New York bar is permitted to participate in the writing of the briefs on the appeals in these eases provided that the briefs are signed and presented to this court by Connecticut counsel who assume full responsibility for their contents. The remainder of the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s “Motion For Permission To Appeal Before This Conrt” in the appeals from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that Alfred S. Julien of the New York bar is permitted to participate in the writing of the briefs on the appeals in these eases provided that the briefs are signed and presented to this court by Connecticut counsel who assume full responsibility for their contents. The remainder of the motion is denied.

Silverman v. Camp, 320 A.2d 832, 166 Conn. 690 (Colo. 1974).

Pincite

320 A.2d 832 (Silverman v. Camp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.