Silverman v. Berson

280 A.D. 854, 113 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3900
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 13, 1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence in an action tried in Sullivan County. As far as can be determined from the moving papers, the proposed new evidence consists of conclusions of a witness, rather than facts. The proposed new evidence was available to plaintiffs long before trial and should have been known by them under the circumstances present. There is an utter failure to show that the proposed new evidence was not and could not have been discovered before trial in the exercise of reasonable diligence. There must be some finality to litigation. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Poster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silverman v. Berson, 280 A.D. 854, 113 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

280 A.D. 854 (Silverman v. Berson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton v. New York State Thruway Authority
17 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton v. New York State Thruway Authority
32 Misc. 2d 479 (New York State Court of Claims, 1962)