Silverman Perlstein & Acampora, LLP v. Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.

303 A.D.2d 576, 756 N.Y.S.2d 762
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 576 (Silverman Perlstein & Acampora, LLP v. Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silverman Perlstein & Acampora, LLP v. Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., 303 A.D.2d 576, 756 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated December 21, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on their first cause of action alleging breach of a lease and granted that branch of defendants’ cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action. Justice Friedmann has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

[577]*577Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In opposition to the defendants’ prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the plaintiffs’ cause of action alleging breach of a lease, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that they either terminated the lease or materially changed their position in reliance on the defendants’ anticipatory repudiation of the same before the repudiation was retracted (see De Forest Radio Tel. & Tel. Co. v Triangle Radio Supply Co., 243 NY 283, 292 [1926]; Restatement [Second] of Contracts § 256 [1]; Harley v Miller, 295 AD2d 401 [2002]; Mattes v C.R. Bard, Inc., 295 . AD2d 324 [2002]; GCDM Ironworks v GJF Constr. Corp., 292 AD2d 495 [2002]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs’ motion and granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ first cause of action alleging breach of the lease. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Shore Ambulatory Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Lynbrook Anesthesia Servs., P.C.
2018 NY Slip Op 6957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Beinstein v. Navani
131 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 A.D.2d 576, 756 N.Y.S.2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverman-perlstein-acampora-llp-v-reckson-operating-partnership-lp-nyappdiv-2003.