Silverio Sanchez-Ortiz v. Pam Bondi, Attorney General of the United States, et al.

Opinion

SILVERIO SANCHEZ-ORTIZ, Case No. 26-cv-01906-BAS

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITION v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE PAM BONDI, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Respondents.

Presently before the Court are a Petition and Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum filed on March 25, 2026. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) The Petition alleges Petitioner was arrested on March 24, 2026, and has not been presented for an initial appearance in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5. Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum directing Respondents to immediately present Petitioner to a magistrate judge for arraignment. Upon review, the Petition and Application do not demonstrate that Petitioner is entitled to relief. Cf. United States v. Pimental, 755 F.3d 1095, 1103–04 (9th Cir. 2014) (finding a four-day delay in presentment over a holiday weekend was unreasonable and /unnecessary). Accordingly, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Petition and Application. (ECF Nos. 1-2.) Petitioner is scheduled for arraignment on March 26, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. In the event that Petitioner is not arraigned on March 26, 2026, Petitioner may renew the Petition and Application. Further, the Clerk of Court shall serve this Order }on the U.S. Attorney’s Office and close the case. ~ DATED: March 26, 2026 (yatta Bihar ank Hon. Cynthia Bashant, Chief Judge United States District Court 4.