Silvering v. Gimpel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silvering v. Gimpel

235 A.D. 623

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 623 (Silvering v. Gimpel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silvering v. Gimpel, 235 A.D. 623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modifying judgment by eliminating therefrom the provision relating to the notes therein and permitting defendant to proceed with the collection of said notes reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the Special Term for determination of that part of the application which seeks to set aside the judgment and for a new trial. The court had no power to modify the judgment. (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modifying judgment by eliminating therefrom the provision relating to the notes therein and permitting defendant to proceed with the collection of said notes reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the Special Term for determination of that part of the application which seeks to set aside the judgment and for a new trial. The court had no power to modify the judgment. (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silvering-v-gimpel-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack