Silverbrandt v. Widmayer

2 Dem. Sur. 263
New York Surrogate's Court·Decided November 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

The Surrogate.

The affidavit which opposes petitioner’s application does not show sufficient cause why that petition should be denied.

A verified statement in the form of an inventory, and ontaining the very matters here averred in respondent’s hhalf, might be deemed a sufficient inventory if acompanied by an appraisal. And such an appraisal [264]*264may be had even without actual inspection of assets. In the decision to the contrary, upon which respondent’s counsel relies (Matter of Robbins, 4 Redf., 144), the late Surrogate seems to have overlooked the case of Butler’s Estate (38 N. Y., 397).

Petition granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silverbrandt v. Widmayer, 2 Dem. Sur. 263 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

2 Dem. Sur. 263 (Silverbrandt v. Widmayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Inventory of the Estate of Butler
38 N.Y. 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1868)
In re the estate of Robbins
4 Redf. 144 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1879)