Silverbrandt v. Widmayer
This text of 2 Dem. Sur. 263 (Silverbrandt v. Widmayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit which opposes petitioner’s application does not show sufficient cause why that petition should be denied.
A verified statement in the form of an inventory, and ontaining the very matters here averred in respondent’s hhalf, might be deemed a sufficient inventory if acompanied by an appraisal. And such an appraisal [264]*264may be had even without actual inspection of assets. In the decision to the contrary, upon which respondent’s counsel relies (Matter of Robbins, 4 Redf., 144), the late Surrogate seems to have overlooked the case of Butler’s Estate (38 N. Y., 397).
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Dem. Sur. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silverbrandt-v-widmayer-nysurct-1883.