Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.
8 S.E. 361, 101 N.C. 679
Opinion
This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N. C., 445. After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm, the .judgment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co., 8 S.E. 361, 101 N.C. 679 (N.C. 1888).
8 S.E. 361 (Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanier v. . Pullman Co.
105 S.E. 21 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)