Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.

8 S.E. 361, 101 N.C. 679

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 5, 1888

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 S.E. 361 (Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. Baltimore Mining Co., 8 S.E. 361, 101 N.C. 679 (N.C. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.

This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N. C., 445. After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm, the .judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.

This appeal has been retained for several terms under an adversari, while the subject matter has been fully considered in the opinion heretofore delivered in the decision of the defendant’s appeal. Silver Valley Co. v. Baltimore Co., 99 N. C., 445. After due consideration, and in view of what is there said, our conclusion is that no error is disclosed in the ruling from which the present appeal is taken, and therefore we affirm, the .judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 S.E. 361, 101 N.C. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-valley-mining-co-v-baltimore-mining-co-nc-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack