Silver v. Towner
This text of Silver v. Towner (Silver v. Towner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FREDERICK OMOYUMA SILVER, No. 84467 Appellant, vs. FILE CANDICE KATIE TOWNER, Res ondent. APR 1 8 2022 ELIZASETH A. BROWN CLERK,F S91REME COURT By ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK /I
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying an objection to a substitution of counsel for respondent. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule allows an appeal from an order denying an objection to a substitution of counsel. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
, J. Hardesty
, J. Stiglich Herndon
'Given this dismissal, this court takes no action in regard to the motion filed on April 11, 2022. cc: Hon. T. Arthur Ritchie, Jr., District Judge, Family Court Division Frederick Omoyuma Silver Candice Katie Towner Eighth District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Silver v. Towner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-towner-nev-2022.