Silver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Silver v. State

504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 809, 2016 WL 4437965

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 23, 2016

DocketNo. ED 104116

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 504 S.W.3d 96 (Silver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silver v. State, 504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 809, 2016 WL 4437965 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Fred Silver appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15 without evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Fred Silver appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15 without evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 809, 2016 WL 4437965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-state-moctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack