Silver v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Silver v. State

504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 809, 2016 WL 4437965

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 23, 2016·No. No. ED 104116·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Fred Silver appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15 without evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Fred Silver appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 29.15 without evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Silver v. State, 504 S.W.3d 96, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 809, 2016 WL 4437965 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

504 S.W.3d 96 (Silver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related