Silver v. State

573 So. 2d 1092, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1471, 1991 WL 22546
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 1991
DocketNo. 89-2098
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 573 So. 2d 1092 (Silver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver v. State, 573 So. 2d 1092, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1471, 1991 WL 22546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The state properly concedes that the trial court erred in imposing an adult sanction upon the defendant, who was a juvenile at the time of the offense, without making the mandatory factual findings as to the suitability of adult sanctions as required by section 39.111(7), Florida Statutes (1987). See State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Green v. State, 506 So.2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petithomme v. State
610 So. 2d 450 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 So. 2d 1092, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1471, 1991 WL 22546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.