Silver v. Quality Taste Restaurant Inc.

11 A.D.3d 239, 782 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11676
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 7, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 239 (Silver v. Quality Taste Restaurant Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver v. Quality Taste Restaurant Inc., 11 A.D.3d 239, 782 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered on or about December 29, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to establish a causal connection between her internal injuries and the ingestion of food from defendants’ restaurant (see Russac v Crest Hollow Country Club, 252 AD2d 548 [1998]; Valenti v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 207 AD2d 340 [1994]). A jury must reach its verdict based on logical inferences from the evidence, rather than on speculation (Tardella v RJR Nabisco, 178 AD2d 737, 739 [1991]). Plaintiff has offered no medical explanation that might reduce the possibility that the foreign object came from an alternative source. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortega v. Trefz
44 A.D.3d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 239, 782 N.Y.S.2d 358, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-quality-taste-restaurant-inc-nyappdiv-2004.