Silver v. Medhkour

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Silver v. Medhkour

821 A.2d 584

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2003, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and REVERSE the Order of the Superior Court. See Wolloch v. Aiken, 815 A.2d 594, 596 (Pa.2002) (Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.3(b) permits a plaintiff to avoid summary judgment by filing a timely response to the motion for summary judgment supplemented by expert reports).

Justices CASTILLE, NIGRO, and SAYLOR dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2003, we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and REVERSE the Order of the Superior Court. See Wolloch v. Aiken, 815 A.2d 594, 596 (Pa.2002) (Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035.3(b) permits a plaintiff to avoid summary judgment by filing a timely response to the motion for summary judgment supplemented by expert reports).

Justices CASTILLE, NIGRO, and SAYLOR dissent.

Silver v. Medhkour, 821 A.2d 584 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

821 A.2d 584 (Silver v. Medhkour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related