Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Silver v. Hull

Silver v. Hull

22 S.E. 578, 97 Ga. 234
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 578 (Silver v. Hull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver v. Hull, 22 S.E. 578, 97 Ga. 234 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Under the facts appearing in the record, the court committed no error in refusing to vacate the judgment complained of, on any of the grounds taken in the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

The motion was overruled, and defendant excepted. O. H. Cohen and Salem Dutcher, by P. J. Sullivan, for plaintiff in error. E. B. Baxter, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. State
177 S.E. 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 578, 97 Ga. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-hull-ga-1895.