Silver v. Gassman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silver v. Gassman

6 A.D.2d 694, 174 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6025

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 A.D.2d 694 (Silver v. Gassman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silver v. Gassman, 6 A.D.2d 694, 174 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding to compel the individual appellants to vacate an order made by one of them, as a Justice of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, sitting in Kings County. The order sought to be vacated was made on October 7, 1957, over the objection of the respondent District Attorney and denied his application to restore a certain case to the calendar of said court for trial. The defendant in that ease had been discharged on his own recognizance pursuant to section 669 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal is from an order of the Special Term granting the petition and directing that the case 'be restored to the calendar for trial. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. It was a ministerial obligation of the appellants to restore the case to the calendar for trial at the instance of the District Attorney (People v. Prosser, 309 N. Y. 353, 358, 361; Matter of McDonald v. Goldstein, 273 App. Div. 649, 650). The refusal to perform was not a judicial determination in the nature of the dismissal of an indictment which would be appealable (Code Crim. Pro., § 518, subd. 3; People v. Hammerstein, 150 App. Div. 212, affd. 211 N. Y. 552; People v. Levenstein, 309 N. Y. 433), but a neglect of a ministerial duty subject to review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. (Matter of Stewart v. City Court of City of Binghamton, 183 Misc. 155, 157; Matter of Bennett v. Merritt, 173 Misc. 355, 362.) Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding to compel the individual appellants to vacate an order made by one of them, as a Justice of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, sitting in Kings County. The order sought to be vacated was made on October 7, 1957, over the objection of the respondent District Attorney and denied his application to restore a certain case to the calendar of said court for trial. The defendant in that ease had been discharged on his own recognizance pursuant to section 669 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal is from an order of the Special Term granting the petition and directing that the case 'be restored to the calendar for trial. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. It was a ministerial obligation of the appellants to restore the case to the calendar for trial at the instance of the District Attorney (People v. Prosser, 309 N. Y. 353, 358, 361; Matter of McDonald v. Goldstein, 273 App. Div. 649, 650). The refusal to perform was not a judicial determination in the nature of the dismissal of an indictment which would be appealable (Code Crim. Pro., § 518, subd. 3; People v. Hammerstein, 150 App. Div. 212, affd. 211 N. Y. 552; People v. Levenstein, 309 N. Y. 433), but a neglect of a ministerial duty subject to review under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act. (Matter of Stewart v. City Court of City of Binghamton, 183 Misc. 155, 157; Matter of Bennett v. Merritt, 173 Misc. 355, 362.) Present—Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 694, 174 N.Y.S.2d 277, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-gassman-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack