Silver v. Feuer

320 N.E.2d 652, 35 N.Y.2d 758, 361 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1242
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 1974·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[760]*760Order affirmed, without costs* on the majority memorandum at the Appellate Division stressing the probabilities in a field of six candidates (see Matter of Ippolito v. Power, 22 N Y 2d 594, involving but two candidates). It is not necessary, therefore, to reach the issue considered by the dissenter at the Appellate Division, namely, whether a new primary election, judicially directed, may be limited to exclude some regularly designated candidates. The Daubner case (Matter of Daubner v. Dinkins, 33 N Y 2d 649) would not be dispositive of the issue since it was not frontally raised there in the Court of Appeals (cf. Matter of Santucci v. Power, 25 N Y 2d 897).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielh, Jones, "Waghtler and Babin. Taking no part: Judge Stevens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silver v. Feuer, 320 N.E.2d 652, 35 N.Y.2d 758, 361 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1242 (N.Y. 1974).

320 N.E.2d 652 (Silver v. Feuer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Webb
134 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Allah
131 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Doherty v. Mahoney
59 A.D.2d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)