Silver v. Elaine Products Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silver v. Elaine Products Co., Inc.

50 A.D.2d 916, 377 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11837

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1975·Published

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 21, 1975, which, after a jury trial on the issue of liability only, set aside the verdict in defendant’s favor and directed a new trial. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In this rear-end collision case, the record on the appeal reveals that the jury could not have reached its conclusion on any fair interpretation of the facts (cf. Friedburg v P. & H. Serv. Sta., 13 AD2d 503; Elegant v Brooks, 20 Misc 2d 542). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 21, 1975, which, after a jury trial on the issue of liability only, set aside the verdict in defendant’s favor and directed a new trial. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In this rear-end collision case, the record on the appeal reveals that the jury could not have reached its conclusion on any fair interpretation of the facts (cf. Friedburg v P. & H. Serv. Sta., 13 AD2d 503; Elegant v Brooks, 20 Misc 2d 542). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Silver v. Elaine Products Co., Inc., 50 A.D.2d 916, 377 N.Y.S.2d 579, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

50 A.D.2d 916 (Silver v. Elaine Products Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related