Silver v. Bowden

117 S.W.2d 161, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 21, 1938·No. No. 3669.·Published

Opinion

NEALON, Chief Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for $525.00. Appellant admitted an indebtedness of $50.00. The jury’s verdict, if followed, required a judgment in appellee’s favor fo,r $259.50. The Court required a remittitur of $97.00, *162 and entered judgment finally for $162.50, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. A careful consideration of the record and of the briefs of the parties fails to convince .us that the Court committed re--versible error, or that the judgment is without support in the evidence. Further comment in cases of-this character is not required by .the statute, .nor,do the questions involved justify prolonged discussion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Stumberg, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 1126.

Judgment is affirmed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silver v. Bowden, 117 S.W.2d 161, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

117 S.W.2d 161 (Silver v. Bowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Stumberg
115 S.W.2d 1126 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling
75 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Tucker v. Higdon
115 S.W.2d 973 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)