Silver v. Bowden

117 S.W.2d 161, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 21, 1938
DocketNo. 3669.
StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.W.2d 161 (Silver v. Bowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver v. Bowden, 117 S.W.2d 161, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

NEALON, Chief Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for $525.00. Appellant admitted an indebtedness of $50.00. The jury’s verdict, if followed, required a judgment in appellee’s favor fo,r $259.50. The Court required a remittitur of $97.00, *162 and entered judgment finally for $162.50, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. A careful consideration of the record and of the briefs of the parties fails to convince .us that the Court committed re--versible error, or that the judgment is without support in the evidence. Further comment in cases of-this character is not required by .the statute, .nor,do the questions involved justify prolonged discussion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Stumberg, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 1126.

Judgment is affirmed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Texas N. O. R. Co. v. Stumberg
115 S.W.2d 1126 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Gatling
75 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Tucker v. Higdon
115 S.W.2d 973 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.W.2d 161, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-bowden-texapp-1938.