Silver v. Barth

570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided February 8, 1990·No. 8374·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal arises out of a foreclosure of a judgment lien against the named defendant Terry Barth. The defendant claims the court erred (1) in rendering judgment against the defendant without first holding a hearing in damages, (2) in rendering judgment without first acting on the defendant’s motion to reopen a default, and (3) in failing to open the default entered against the defendant.

After a plenary reivew of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silver v. Barth, 570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

570 A.2d 243 (Silver v. Barth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silver v. Barth
574 A.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)