Silver v. Barth

570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1990
Docket8374
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 570 A.2d 243 (Silver v. Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver v. Barth, 570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal arises out of a foreclosure of a judgment lien against the named defendant Terry Barth. The defendant claims the court erred (1) in rendering judgment against the defendant without first holding a hearing in damages, (2) in rendering judgment without first acting on the defendant’s motion to reopen a default, and (3) in failing to open the default entered against the defendant.

After a plenary reivew of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silver v. Barth
574 A.2d 218 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-barth-connappct-1990.