Silver v. Barth
This text of 570 A.2d 243 (Silver v. Barth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal arises out of a foreclosure of a judgment lien against the named defendant Terry Barth. The defendant claims the court erred (1) in rendering judgment against the defendant without first holding a hearing in damages, (2) in rendering judgment without first acting on the defendant’s motion to reopen a default, and (3) in failing to open the default entered against the defendant.
After a plenary reivew of the record, transcripts and briefs, and after affording each claim of error the appropriate scope of review, we conclude that all claims are without merit. Schiavone v. Schiavone, 18 Conn. App. 825, 559 A.2d 1192 (1989).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
570 A.2d 243, 20 Conn. App. 827, 1990 Conn. App. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-v-barth-connappct-1990.