Silver Springs Shores, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Silver Springs Shores, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

336 So. 2d 382, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15287

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 19, 1976

DocketNo. BB-314

StatusPublished

This text of 336 So. 2d 382 (Silver Springs Shores, Inc. v. Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silver Springs Shores, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 336 So. 2d 382, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent has filed herein a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Brief for failure to comply with the Florida Appellate Rules. We have repeatedly admonished counsel of the importance of complying with Rule 3.7, FAR pertaining to the form and content of appellate briefs. (See American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 308 So.2d 639; Okaloosa Island L. Ass’n, Inc. v. Okaloosa Island A., Fla.App. 1st, 1975, 308 So.2d 120; Davis v. Sails, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So.2d 615, and Smith v. Smith, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 309 So.2d 615) Failure to substantially comply with the requirements of that rule will result in this Court, either upon motion of the opposing party or of its own volition, striking such brief.

Examination of petitioner’s brief reveals that petitioner has not substantially [383]*383complied with the above mentioned rule. Accordingly, respondent’s motion to strike is granted and petitioner’s brief is hereby stricken. Petitioner is allowed 15 days from date hereof within which to file and serve an amended brief, complying with the Florida Appellate Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Respondent has filed herein a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Brief for failure to comply with the Florida Appellate Rules. We have repeatedly admonished counsel of the importance of complying with Rule 3.7, FAR pertaining to the form and content of appellate briefs. (See American Baseball Cap, Inc. v. Duzinski, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 308 So.2d 639; Okaloosa Island L. Ass’n, Inc. v. Okaloosa Island A., Fla.App. 1st, 1975, 308 So.2d 120; Davis v. Sails, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So.2d 615, and Smith v. Smith, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 309 So.2d 615) Failure to substantially comply with the requirements of that rule will result in this Court, either upon motion of the opposing party or of its own volition, striking such brief.

Examination of petitioner’s brief reveals that petitioner has not substantially [383]*383complied with the above mentioned rule. Accordingly, respondent’s motion to strike is granted and petitioner’s brief is hereby stricken. Petitioner is allowed 15 days from date hereof within which to file and serve an amended brief, complying with the Florida Appellate Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

336 So. 2d 382, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-springs-shores-inc-v-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack