Silver Scope Design, Inc. v. Walters

Missouri Court of Appeals

Silver Scope Design, Inc. v. Walters

400 S.W.3d 836, 2013 WL 1901144, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 552

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 7, 2013·No. No. ED 98240·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Chris Walters, d/b/a Assurance Protection Group, LLC (“Defendant”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, entered in favor of Silver Scope Design, Inc. and Stephen Dulle (“Plaintiffs”), on their claims of breach of contract and action on account for an amount of $23,326 plus interest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Chris Walters, d/b/a Assurance Protection Group, LLC (“Defendant”), appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, entered in favor of Silver Scope Design, Inc. and Stephen Dulle (“Plaintiffs”), on their claims of breach of contract and action on account for an amount of $23,326 plus interest. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Silver Scope Design, Inc. v. Walters, 400 S.W.3d 836, 2013 WL 1901144, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 552 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

400 S.W.3d 836 (Silver Scope Design, Inc. v. Walters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.