Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal
This text of Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal (Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant
v.
JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________
2015-2072 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00245. ______________________
Decided: October 24, 2017 ______________________
DARREN EDWARD DONNELLY, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre- sented by JASON E. AMSEL; EMAN SOJOODI, San Francisco, CA. 2 SILVER PEAK SYSTEMS, INC. v. MATAL
JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, ROBERT MCBRIDE. ______________________
Before PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. PROST, Chief Judge. In light of this court’s en banc decision in Aqua Prod- ucts, Inc. v. Matal, No. 2015-1177, 2017 WL 4399000 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2017) (en banc), the judgment of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is vacated and this case is re- manded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with Aqua. VACATED AND REMANDED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Silver Peak Systems, Inc. v. Matal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-peak-systems-inc-v-matal-cafc-2017.