Silver Clipper, Inc. v. Liebmann (In re Silver Clipper, Inc.)

96 F. App'x 900
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 2004
DocketNos. 03-2115, 03-2116
StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. App'x 900 (Silver Clipper, Inc. v. Liebmann (In re Silver Clipper, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver Clipper, Inc. v. Liebmann (In re Silver Clipper, Inc.), 96 F. App'x 900 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Silver Clipper, Inc., and Ron Morgan, the sole shareholder of Silver Clipper, appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving the settlement of the claims of Kirk Carter and Reginald Fitzgerald against Silver Clipper. We have reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible error. See Protective Comm. for Indep. Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414, 424-25, 88 S.Ct. 1157, 20 L.Ed.2d 1 (1968). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Silver Clipper, Inc. v. Liebmann, Nos. CA-03-1730-AMD; CA-03-1729-AMD; BK-01-5-9209-SD (D.Md. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. App'x 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-clipper-inc-v-liebmann-in-re-silver-clipper-inc-ca4-2004.