Silver Clipper Inc v. Liebmann

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 18, 2004
Docket03-2115
StatusUnpublished

This text of Silver Clipper Inc v. Liebmann (Silver Clipper Inc v. Liebmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silver Clipper Inc v. Liebmann, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2115

In Re: SILVER CLIPPER, INCORPORATED,

Debtor.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SILVER CLIPPER, INCORPORATED,

Debtor - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. LIEBMANN,

Trustee - Appellee.

No. 03-2116

RON MORGAN,

Claimant - Appellant,

Trustee - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03- 1730-AMD; CA-03-1729-AMD; BK-01-5-9209-SD)

Submitted: April 21, 2004 Decided: May 18, 2004

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Stolarz, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. Orbie R. Shively, LIEBMANN & SHIVELY, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Silver Clipper, Inc., and Ron Morgan, the sole

shareholder of Silver Clipper, appeal from the district court’s

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order approving the

settlement of the claims of Kirk Carter and Reginald Fitzgerald

against Silver Clipper. We have reviewed the record, the parties’

briefs, and the lower courts’ opinions and find no reversible

error. See Protective Comm. for Indep. Stockholders of TMT Trailer

Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson, 390 U.S. 414, 424-25 (1968). Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Silver

Clipper, Inc. v. Liebmann, Nos. CA-03-1730-AMD; CA-03-1729-AMD; BK-

01-5-9209-SD (D. Md. Aug. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Silver Clipper Inc v. Liebmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silver-clipper-inc-v-liebmann-ca4-2004.