Silveira v. Lockyer
328 F.3d 567, 2003 WL 21004622
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2003·No. No. 01-15098·Published·Cited by 21 cases
Opinions
Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge GOULD.
ORDER
A majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. FED. R. APP. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silveira v. Lockyer, 328 F.3d 567, 2003 WL 21004622 (9th Cir. 2003).
328 F.3d 567 (Silveira v. Lockyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duncan v. Becerra
265 F. Supp. 3d 1106 (S.D. California, 2017)
Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United States
836 F.3d 336 (Third Circuit, 2016)
Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Hickenlooper
2015 COA 45 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2016)
Nordyke v. King
664 F.3d 774 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Nelson v. University of Texas at Dallas
491 F. Supp. 2d 672 (N.D. Texas, 2007)
Parker v. District of Columbia
478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Circuit, 2007)
Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita
458 F. Supp. 2d 775 (S.D. Indiana, 2006)
Whether the Second Amendment Secures an Individual Right
Office of Legal Counsel, 2004
Mosby v. Devine
851 A.2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2004)
Harold Sampson Children's Trust v. Linda Gale Sampson 1979 Trust
2003 WI App 141 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2003)
Silveira v. Lockyer
328 F.3d 567 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)