Silva v. Vizcarrondo

31 A.D.3d 292, 819 N.Y.S.2d 246
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered September 26, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, the complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

The affirmation of plaintiffs treating physician, based upon six physical examinations of plaintiff over the course of 17 months beginning shortly after the accident, included her findings of limited ranges of motion in the lumbar and cervical spine and right elbow, which she assigned specific percentages and compared to the normal range. Contrary to the motion court’s conclusion, this met the minimal standard required to substantiate a claim of “serious injury” pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silva v. Vizcarrondo, 31 A.D.3d 292, 819 N.Y.S.2d 246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

31 A.D.3d 292 (Silva v. Vizcarrondo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kithcart v. Mason
51 A.D.3d 1162 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Atkinson v. Oliver
36 A.D.3d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)