Silva v. Vizcarrondo
This text of 31 A.D.3d 292 (Silva v. Vizcarrondo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered September 26, 2005, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, the complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
The affirmation of plaintiffs treating physician, based upon six physical examinations of plaintiff over the course of 17 months beginning shortly after the accident, included her findings of limited ranges of motion in the lumbar and cervical spine and right elbow, which she assigned specific percentages and compared to the normal range. Contrary to the motion court’s conclusion, this met the minimal standard required to substantiate a claim of “serious injury” pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.3d 292, 819 N.Y.S.2d 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-vizcarrondo-nyappdiv-2006.