Silva v. Silva
This text of Silva v. Silva (Silva v. Silva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-2008 Lower Tribunal No. 10-20850 ________________
Alberto Silva, Appellant,
vs.
Mary H. Silva, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Arthur L. Rothenberg, Senior Judge.
Andrew M. Kassier, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee), Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, Department of Revenue.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. On the record before us, we conclude that the trial court did not commit
reversible error when it denied the Former Husband’s Motion to Vacate. There was
no basis upon which to impute income to the mother, see § 61.30, Fla. Stat., and
the Department of Revenue established a substantial change in circumstances
requiring an increase in the father’s child support obligation, see § 61.14, Fla. Stat.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Silva v. Silva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-silva-fladistctapp-2019.