Silva v. Palmateer

56 P.3d 963, 184 Or. App. 745, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1726
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 6, 2002·No. 98C-21282; A112618·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of attempted murder, assault in the second degree, and menacing. Pursuant to ORS 161.725, the sentencing court found him to be a dangerous offender and imposed a 24-year sentence, with a 90-month minimum, on the attempted murder conviction and a concurrent 70-month sentence on the assault conviction. In his petition for post-conviction relief, petitioner alleges that the dangerous offender sentence is unlawful under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000). He also alleges that his trial and appellate counsel failed to provide constitutionally adequate assistance of counsel in various respects.

Petitioner’s Apprendi claim is controlled by our decision in Teague v. Palmateer, 184 Or App 577, 57 P3d 176 (2002). As to the balance of his claims, we affirm without discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silva v. Palmateer, 56 P.3d 963, 184 Or. App. 745, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1726 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

56 P.3d 963 (Silva v. Palmateer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Teague v. Palmateer
57 P.3d 176 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)