Silva v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

150 A. 916, 111 Conn. 725
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 5, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 A. 916 (Silva v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silva v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 150 A. 916, 111 Conn. 725 (Colo. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was injured by being run into by defendant’s engine and train at a highway grade-crossing in New London. The defendant does not contest the issue of its own negligence. The court set aside the verdict because, “as the plaintiff approached the crossing the train was in plain sight, and if he had looked he would have seen it,” and for the further reason that the damages were excessive.

We are unable to hold that the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict because the plaintiff had failed to prove that his own negligence did not materially contribute to the injuries for which he sued.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. Radville
153 A. 154 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A. 916, 111 Conn. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-new-york-new-haven-hartford-railroad-conn-1930.