Silva v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Ninth Circuit

Silva v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

110 F. App'x 830

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 7, 2004·No. No. 03-16003; D.C. No. CV-S-01-0442-LRH-LRL·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Manuel Silva appeals the district court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“Metro”) and individual officers named as defendants (the “Defendant Officers”). Silva brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Defendant Officers as individuals and Metro as a munici[831]*831pality, alleging that the Defendant Officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights by conducting an unreasonable search and seizure and by using excessive force against him. In addition, Silva brought tort claims under Nevada state law. See Nev.Rev.Stat. 41.032. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm for the reasons set out by the district judge in his order granting summary judgment dated May 12, 2003.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM

**

Manuel Silva appeals the district court’s granting of the motion for summary judgment of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“Metro”) and individual officers named as defendants (the “Defendant Officers”). Silva brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Defendant Officers as individuals and Metro as a munici[831]*831pality, alleging that the Defendant Officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights by conducting an unreasonable search and seizure and by using excessive force against him. In addition, Silva brought tort claims under Nevada state law. See Nev.Rev.Stat. 41.032. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We affirm for the reasons set out by the district judge in his order granting summary judgment dated May 12, 2003.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Silva v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 110 F. App'x 830 (9th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 830 (Silva v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related