Silva v. Helvenston, No. 087512 (Dec. 18, 1990)

Connecticut Superior Court

Silva v. Helvenston, No. 087512 (Dec. 18, 1990)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4932

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedDecember 18, 1990

DocketNo. 087512

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4932 (Silva v. Helvenston, No. 087512 (Dec. 18, 1990)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silva v. Helvenston, No. 087512 (Dec. 18, 1990), 1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4932 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#123) The court adopts the reasoning of Judge Hammer as set forth in Hull v. Cumberland Farms Food Stores, Inc., 35 Conn. Sup. 283 (1979), and his conclusion (p. 286) as follows:

"Although the facts giving rise to the duty CT Page 4933 owed to the plaintiffs are the same, each spouse has an entirely different cause of action and the assertion of one spouse's right within the statutory period of limitations does not excuse the failure to assert the other's separate and independent right."

The objection to the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is overruled.

GAFFNEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#123) The court adopts the reasoning of Judge Hammer as set forth in Hull v. Cumberland Farms Food Stores, Inc., 35 Conn. Sup. 283 (1979), and his conclusion (p. 286) as follows:

"Although the facts giving rise to the duty CT Page 4933 owed to the plaintiffs are the same, each spouse has an entirely different cause of action and the assertion of one spouse's right within the statutory period of limitations does not excuse the failure to assert the other's separate and independent right."

The objection to the defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is overruled.

GAFFNEY, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 4932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-helvenston-no-087512-dec-18-1990-connsuperct-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack