Silva v. Goord

297 A.D.2d 897, 747 N.Y.2d 405, 747 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795

This text of 297 A.D.2d 897 (Silva v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silva v. Goord, 297 A.D.2d 897, 747 N.Y.2d 405, 747 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Petefs, J.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a June 12, 2001 determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from engaging in, encouraging or soliciting sexual activity. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has now received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of De Jesus v Goord, 282 AD2d 853; Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808).

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curtis v. Goord
274 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
De Jesus v. Goord
282 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 897, 747 N.Y.2d 405, 747 N.Y.S.2d 405, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silva-v-goord-nyappdiv-2002.