Silva v. Dist. Ct. (Dept. of Family Services)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 11, 2015·No. 68752·Unpublished

Opinion

whether that trial has occurred or whether the juvenile court has heard or ruled on the merits of the case. Accordingly, we deny this writ petition. See NRS 34.320; Intl Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844; see also Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (stating that a petition for extraordinary writ relief is purely discretionary with this court). It is so ORDERED.

1_21 I fligt Parragu=C

J. Douglas

, J.

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Aaron Grigsby Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1.947A 6ilre.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silva v. Dist. Ct. (Dept. of Family Services), (Neb. 2015).

Silva v. Dist. Ct. (Dept. of Family Services) (Silva v. Dist. Ct. (Dept. of Family Services)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court
818 P.2d 849 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1991)