Siluwal v. Holder
This text of 556 F. App'x 569 (Siluwal v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nepalese citizen Tuk Bahadur Siluwal petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, which upheld an immigration judge’s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). After careful review, we conclude that the denial of relief was supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 775, 781, 784 (8th Cir.2008) (substantial-evidence standard for reviewing denials of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 F. App'x 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siluwal-v-holder-ca8-2014.