Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp.
This text of 2022 Ohio 4659 (Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio- 4659.]
NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.
SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-4659 SILTSTONE SERVICES, L.L.C., APPELLEE, v. GUERNSEY COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS; ET AL., APPELLEES. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Siltstone Servs., L.L.C. v. Guernsey Cty. Community Dev. Corp., Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-4659.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm. and Ohio Pub. Works Comm. v. Barnesville. (No. 2020-1093―Submitted December 23, 2022―Decided December 27, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Guernsey County, No. 19CA000047, 2020-Ohio-3877. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Siltstone Resources, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pub. Works Comm., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022- Ohio-483, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Ohio Pub. Works Comm. v. Barnesville, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2022-Ohio-4603, ___ N.E.3d ___. Appellant Guernsey County SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Community Development Corporation’s proposition of law No. III is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and FISCHER, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. KENNEDY, J., dissents and for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in Barnesville, would reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and would reinstate the trial court’s judgment. DEWINE, J., dissents and would reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and would reinstate the trial court’s judgment. _________________ Dave Yost, Attorney General, Benjamin M. Flowers, Solicitor General, Samuel C. Peterson, Deputy Solicitor General, and Rachel Huston and Caroline Mills, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee Ohio Public Works Commission. Kohrman, Jackson & Krantz, L.L.P., and Maribeth Meluch; and Hanlon, McCormick, Schramm, Bickford & Schramm Co., L.P.A., Erik A. Schramm, and Kyle W. Bickford, for appellant Guernsey County Community Development Corporation. Pelini, Campbell & Williams, L.L.C., Craig G. Pelini, and Paul B. Ricard, for appellants Synergy Land Company, L.L.C., and Whispering Pines Land Company, L.L.C. Bricker & Eckler, L.L.P., Matthew W. Warnock, Christine Rideout Schirra, Kara H. Herrnstein, and Aaron M. Bruggeman, for appellant Gulfport Energy Corporation. _________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 Ohio 4659, 220 N.E.3d 762, 171 Ohio St. 3d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siltstone-servs-llc-v-guernsey-cty-community-dev-corp-ohio-2022.