Silsby v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray's Harbor Railroad

32 P. 1067, 6 Wash. 295, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 280
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1893
DocketNo. 623
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 P. 1067 (Silsby v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray's Harbor Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silsby v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray's Harbor Railroad, 32 P. 1067, 6 Wash. 295, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 280 (Wash. 1893).

Opinion

Anders, J.

The questions presented in the record in this case are identical with those in the case of Hatch v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray’s Harbor Railroad Company, ante, p. 1, and, by stipulation of counsel, both cáuses were heard together, one brief only being filed.

Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer to defendant’s special answer.

Dunbar, C. J., and Scott and Stiles, JJ., concur.

Hoyt, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation District
101 P. 81 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1908)
Blackwell, Enid & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Gist
1907 OK 60 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 P. 1067, 6 Wash. 295, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silsby-v-tacoma-olympia-grays-harbor-railroad-wash-1893.