Silsbee v. City of Salem
103 Mass. 144
Opinion
The respondents have obeyed the order of the court so far as to bring an action; but they have not proceeded to try the title. The case came on for trial, and, as they produced no evidence, the court ordered a nonsuit. According to our practice, such an order against a party in court was irregular ; but, as no exception was taken, the respondents must be regarded as having assented to it. Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silsbee v. City of Salem, 103 Mass. 144 (Mass. 1869).
103 Mass. 144 (Silsbee v. City of Salem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
May v. New England Railroad
50 N.E. 652 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Brown v. Matthews
117 Mass. 506 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1875)