Silox Pure Water Co. v. Vendome Lunch Co.

219 Mass. 194
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 6, 1914·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This is an action of replevin. The defendant filed a plea in abatement founded on objections to the form and sufficiency of the bond. The court, acting under R. L. c. 190, § 18, ordered that a new bond should be given, which duly was executed, approved and filed. This was authorized whether a plea in abatement or a motion to dismiss was filed. The purpose of the statute is that no action of replevin shall fail by reason of defect in form or substance of the bond provided it was intended in good faith to comply with the law and the defect is remedied by a new bond.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Silox Pure Water Co. v. Vendome Lunch Co., 219 Mass. 194 (Mass. 1914).

219 Mass. 194 (Silox Pure Water Co. v. Vendome Lunch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Central Finance Corp. v. Angelico
11 Mass. App. Dec. 72 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)