Sillah v. Gonzales

180 F. App'x 432
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2006·No. No. 05-1712·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ousman M. Sillah, a native and citizen of Gambia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); 8 [433]*433C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Sillah, No. A72-000-231 (B.I.A. June 3, 2005). We deny Sillah’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sillah v. Gonzales, 180 F. App'x 432 (4th Cir. 2006).

180 F. App'x 432 (Sillah v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty
502 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1992)