Silken v. Farrell

278 A.D. 592, 102 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 29, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 592 (Silken v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Silken v. Farrell, 278 A.D. 592, 102 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a covenant of quiet enjoyment in a long-term lease, defendant moved to set aside and vacate a default judgment, obtained by plaintiff after service by publication, and for leave to serve an answer and [593]*593counterclaim pursuant to section 217 of the Civil Practice Act. The motion was granted without terms. A motion for reargument was made and on reargument the court adhered to the original decision, stating: “Whether or not defendant should be made to bear the burden of the sheriff’s fees or the advertising costs is a matter which should abide the event when, as, and if, the trial of this matter is concluded.” Order on reargument modified by striking from the last ordering paragraph the words “ adhered to ” and substituting in place thereof the following: “modified so as to provide that the judgment entered herein in favor of plaintiff against defendant on May 18, 1950, for $20,374.30 be and the same hereby is set aside and vacated upon condition that defendant pay the taxable costs to date, as well as plaintiff’s disbursements.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, with leave to defendant to serve her answer and counterclaim within fifteen days after the entry of the order hereon. It was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant defendant’s motion to open her default without imposing terms. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Firstenberg v. Bills
20 A.D.2d 548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Gallagher v. Tantalo
10 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re the Probate of the Will of Mars
203 Misc. 102 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 592, 102 N.Y.S.2d 221, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silken-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1951.