Silk & Bunks, P. C. v. Greenfield
102 A.D.2d 734
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 14, 1984·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
— Petition for judgment, pursuant to CPLR article 78, in the nature of a writ of mandamus, compelling respondent to render a decision [735] in motions now pending before him in the action Silk & Bunks v Danzig, granted, without costs and without disbursements, and without opinion. Settle judgment. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Silverman, Fein and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Silk & Bunks, P. C. v. Greenfield, 102 A.D.2d 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
102 A.D.2d 734 (Silk & Bunks, P. C. v. Greenfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charalabidis v. Elnagar
2020 NY Slip Op 04913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Law Offices of Russell I. Marnell, P.C. v. Blydenburgh
26 A.D.3d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
DeCintio v. Cohalan
18 A.D.3d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Spring Realty Co. v. New York City Loft Board
127 Misc. 2d 1090 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)