Siliven v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Siliven v. State

288 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112, 2009 WL 2370803

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 28, 2009

DocketED 91785

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 S.W.3d 830 (Siliven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Siliven v. State, 288 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112, 2009 WL 2370803 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Siliven appeals the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Siliven’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rebecca Siliven appeals the judgment denying her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Siliven’s motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment of the motion court under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 S.W.3d 830, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1112, 2009 WL 2370803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siliven-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack