Silfen v. United Whelan Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Silfen v. United Whelan Corp.

27 A.D.2d 808, 280 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4715

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 808 (Silfen v. United Whelan Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Silfen v. United Whelan Corp., 27 A.D.2d 808, 280 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

—■ Order, entered on March 3, 1966, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion denied. While this complaint is no model of an artful pleading, the allegations therein are sufficiently particular to apprise the court and the parties of the subject matter of the controversy. (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60.) The complaint sufficiently alleges breach of a retirement agreement and resulting damages. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—■ Order, entered on March 3, 1966, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion denied. While this complaint is no model of an artful pleading, the allegations therein are sufficiently particular to apprise the court and the parties of the subject matter of the controversy. (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60.) The complaint sufficiently alleges breach of a retirement agreement and resulting damages. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 808, 280 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/silfen-v-united-whelan-corp-nyappdiv-1967.