Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Supreme Court

Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

434 U.S. 829, 98 S. Ct. 109, 54 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 2895

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 3, 1977·No. No. 76-1715·Published·Cited by 61 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 434 U.S. 829, 98 S. Ct. 109, 54 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 2895 (1977).

Pincite

434 U.S. 829 (Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant

14 F.3d 477 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)

Jaime De Anda v. City of Long Beach

7 F.3d 1418 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)

Ferraro v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services

780 F. Supp. 978 (E.D. New York, 1992)

Shields v. Keating

140 F.R.D. 425 (D. Arizona, 1992)

In Re MDC Holdings Securities Litigation

754 F. Supp. 785 (S.D. California, 1990)

Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors

740 F. Supp. 572 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1990)

Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., William v. Weldon, William v. Weldon, Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr.

885 F.2d 723 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)

Ross v. Bank South, N.A.

885 F.2d 723 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Related