Home/Supreme Court/Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

434 U.S. 829, 98 S. Ct. 109, 54 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 2895
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 1977
DocketNo. 76-1715
StatusPublished
Cited by61 cases

This text of 434 U.S. 829 (Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Siletti v. New York City Employees' Retirement System, 434 U.S. 829, 98 S. Ct. 109, 54 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 2895 (1977).

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States
91 Fed. Cl. 447 (Federal Claims, 2010)
City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.
2008 OK 28 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2008)
In Re Enron Corp. Securities
529 F. Supp. 2d 644 (S.D. Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte AmSouth Bancorporation
717 So. 2d 357 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1998)
Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
97 F.3d 1227 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Monica Valentino v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
97 F.3d 1227 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Schaefer v. Overland Express Family of Funds
169 F.R.D. 124 (S.D. California, 1996)
Ex Parte Masonite Corp.
681 So. 2d 1068 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)
Trauma Service Group, Ltd. v. United States
33 Fed. Cl. 426 (Federal Claims, 1995)
In re Copley Pharmaceutical, Inc.
161 F.R.D. 456 (D. Wyoming, 1995)
In re Alco International Group, Inc.
158 F.R.D. 152 (S.D. California, 1994)
Arnold v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.
158 F.R.D. 439 (N.D. California, 1994)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,084 Murray Zucker, and Salomon Brothers Inc. Montgomery Securities v. Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred W. Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela Wasserman, Murray Zucker on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Maxicare Health Plans Inc. Fred Wasserman Pamela K. Anderson AKA Pamela K. Wasserman David M. Hallis Samuel L. Westover Gerald Zaid Charles W. Smith, III Randall Anderson Howard Freedland James A. McIntyre Alan Bloom Charles E. Lewis Peter J. Ratican v. Ernst & Young, Successor-In-Interest to Ernst & Whinney, Objector-Appellant
14 F.3d 477 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Jaime De Anda v. City of Long Beach
7 F.3d 1418 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Ferraro v. Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services
780 F. Supp. 978 (E.D. New York, 1992)
Shields v. Keating
140 F.R.D. 425 (D. Arizona, 1992)
In Re MDC Holdings Securities Litigation
754 F. Supp. 785 (S.D. California, 1990)
Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors
740 F. Supp. 572 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1990)
Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., William v. Weldon, William v. Weldon, Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr.
885 F.2d 723 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Ross v. Bank South, N.A.
885 F.2d 723 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
434 U.S. 829, 98 S. Ct. 109, 54 L. Ed. 2d 88, 1977 U.S. LEXIS 2895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/siletti-v-new-york-city-employees-retirement-system-scotus-1977.