Siler v. Ward

1 N.C. 548
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Siler v. Ward. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 N.C. 161
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 15, 1814·Published

Opinion

Henderson, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Where an act is done by a person, which is referable either to his natural or political capacity, certainty requires that it should appear in the act itself, that it was done in his political capacity, to make it an official act. But where the act is peculiar to his political capacity, there is no necessity of a declaration that it is done in his official capacity; for the act itself so declares. The writing offered in evidence in this case is peculiar to the official capacity of Mr. Smith; it was, therefore, entirely unnecessary for him further to declare in what capacity he acted it. It would be perfect tautology to do it.

Let the rule for a new trial be discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Siler v. Ward, 1 N.C. 548 (N.C. 1814).

1 N.C. 548 (Siler v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.