Siler v. Katta

Fourth Circuit

Siler v. Katta

86 F. App'x 628

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 9, 2004·No. No. 03-7839·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan M. Siler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging a violation under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Siler v. Katta, No. CA-03-100 (E.D.Va. Nov. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan M. Siler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint alleging a violation under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Siler v. Katta, No. CA-03-100 (E.D.Va. Nov. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Siler v. Katta, 86 F. App'x 628 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

86 F. App'x 628 (Siler v. Katta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related